The Grooved Whale Project

For the past 10 or so years I have been looking for the codes that create music.

Most of my explorations ended up on digital equipment where I could reduce things to numbers and examine their mathematical patterns.  I learned quite a bit by doing this but programming electronics does not feed my soul.  The greatest pleasure for me as a musician is to interact with others, where I open myself up to the risks and rewards of creating in real time.

I have been working with three musicians – Kirk Watson, Alcvin Ramos and Haagen – and have found myself invigorated and challenged as a musician to bring my best to the table. We’ve been jamming and improvising together where nothing is scripted but everything unfolds beautifully. The thrill of interacting with others – of listening and responding, testing my boundaries, taking leaps of faith – is for me the creative adventure of music making.

Music is easy to create if you know and follow the codes. The kicker is it takes a lifetime to learn them. Every day I practice. Today I worked on a track that I thought would be interesting to post a sample of. It is only an exploration of a patch I created. It consists of a sparse bass line and some percussive elements, is 1 bar in pattern length and is tweaked in real time.

The difference between this improvised track and a finished song is in orders of magnitude. There are mistakes or musically undesirable parts to this track. There are boring parts – parts where you wish something might change.  There are also parts which groove where I should have stayed rather than move on. Such is the benefit of hindsight. Once I learn the patch I will be better able to control these elements.

This track may eventually become a component of a song, or it may end up being one of countless explorations that never make it to the light of day. Anyways, thot i would post it for your edification and/or enjoyment

Here are two more snippets from explorations from this week:
This one explores filter sweeps.

This one explores gating my violin in different patterns

Had a wonderful time at Entheos this weekend. Gave my first ever workshop on my research with music and whales. It felt really good to do – to finally release some of my ideas out there and get feedback. A rite of passage.

Back in the studio tonight, preparing for Shambhala. I’ve been working closely with two amazing musicians, Kirk Watson and Alcvin Ramos, focusing our creative efforts on how best to combine our acoustic instruments (violin, bass, shakuhachi) with technology. We will now be joined by a third amazing musician, live PA artist Haagen who will bring his gear into the mix. Together, we will be exploring the creation of human music.

Working with these fellow musicians has definitely broadened my horizons in terms of understanding music. First and foremost they release me from playing every role in the creation of a song. I can better concentrate on specific aspects of sound. I can take time to listen to what’s evolving outside the realm of my own creation. I can rest, recharge and wait for musical inspiration to hit.

The communication that is created between musicians is one of the most intriguing features of music. How do we know what to play and when to play it? What are the cues we are listening for? Why do we have these cues and where do they come from? Is music an innate language or one that we learn as we grow as musicians?

When I look at the many different avenues I have explored over the past decade in my search for music in other species, one of the main differentiators I see between us and other creatures is that the human species has many songs and we have to create each and every one of them.

How is a song brought into being? Why is it brought into being? What is its lifespan? Why do some outlive others? Can everyone create music? What is the ratio of creators to listeners? Why do composers compose? Why do I compose?

What would the human species look like if we only had one song? Would we still consider ourselves be a musical animal?

Over the course of the Grooved Whale Project and my research into whale song I’ve radically altered how I process the world. I’ve become accustom to analyzing myself and my behaviors much as I would do another species. The challenge I had with analyzing my musical behavior was that when my brain was in the state of music, no logic was allowed to enter. Let me explain:

When I am fully involved in music (most often while playing my violin) I am in a place where the sound plays me. There is no conscious decision of what notes to play, of moving the bow up and down. There is no conscious recognition of individual notes, patterns or progressions. The music just is. It pulls me in and directs me where to go.

This state is recognizable – I see it in performers when they hit the zone. Have a look at this James Brown video but first turn the sound down. If you were a non-musical species studying this behavior, what would you conclude?

While my research has been mainly focused on understanding the humpback whale and its form of sonic logic, I’ve come to realize that my own species has variations of perception and communication that I can’t even begin to imagine.

Often while composing I play with the idea of inhabiting an alternate biology, re-visioning my music to fit a human with 6 fingers instead of 5, or playing with the idea of extending our hearing range or rhythmic acuity. I have to wonder tho, how I would write music for the creator of the video below? How would my music need to sound to fit into her world?

Immature artists imitate. Mature artists steal.
Lionel Trilling

Studying humpback whale song has made me interested in where human songs come from and the idea of copyright. Are songs the creations of our own mind or do we use other songs for inspiration? Humpbacks seem to borrow and trade quite freely, as noted by researcher Mike Noad when the east coast humpbacks in Australia adopted the tune sung by the west coast whales.  (More on this here).  I have to wonder if before money was attached to copyright, our species did the same.

Where is the dividing line between inspiration and out-and-out stealing? The Black Eyed Peas are currently being sued by Phoenix Phenom for the song below. A valid lawsuit? Check out these videos.

Much has been written about how music can heal, but can music harm?

Since first traveling to Alaska to hear the Humpback feeding call in 1996 I have often wondered if these animals had a root sense of music. The patterned play of notes seemed too close to my ear to discount this possibility.

On my journey from being a musician to being a “music researcher” I had to drastically change the way I interacted with sound. Basically I had to remove all of music’s hold on my brain so that I could study it without being influenced by it.

My main technique was to compose with tracks out of alignment, making my music sound absolutely horrendous. Listening to my creations caused multiple physical reactions – from my back tensing up, to jaw aches and migraines.

Not many people get a chance to listen to “wrong” music (as opposed to bad music or music you might not understand) as by the time a song hits production, the alignment and symmetry of a piece are usually fixed but if music can heal, can it also harm?

“Inside the Music explores the whys and wherefores of music, through documentaries and radio series about the lives and work of great Canadian musicians.”

I received an invite to be interviewed by the CBC Radio series “Inside the Music” .  I am honored as this was an opportunity to inspire and share my work, but also to be considered among the great names in Canadian music was humbling.

Presented by National Geographic Explorer Wade Davis, the Interview will be aired this Sunday, November 22nd at 3:00pm on Radio 2 or 9:00pm on Radio 1.

At 45 feet and just as many tons, the Humpback Whales of the northwest Pacific congregate each summer to feed in the waters of southeast Alaska and journey each winter to the tropical breeding grounds of Hawaii. The fifth largest of the great whales,

Classified as a Cetacean – or marine mammal – Humpbacks are warm-blooded, give birth to live young, use lungs to breath and retain similar sensory organs to ours – eyes, ears, nose (blowhole) and are thought to be descendants of land mammals similar to present day cows.

Humpbacks are named for the distinctive arch thier backs make when diving. Other identifying features include the small dorsal notch on the back, elegant flukes and extraordinarily long pectoral fins – which gives rise to their scientific name: megaptera noveangiliae (translation: Big Wings of New England).

Most often, the underside of the fluke has a unique black and white pigmentation pattern that allows for easy identification of the individual. Some flukes are entirely black, in which case the shape of the fluke becomes its identifying character. Other times, a notch or tear in the fluke provides the necessary information.

In summer, Humpbacks feed on two types of food – Krill (tiny shrimp-like creatures) and Herring. When Herring is on the menu, the whales coordinate efforts in a behavior known as lunge or group feeding which entails a group of whales encircling a ball of Herring in an underwater trap known as a bubblenet. As the bubbles rise, a whale trumpets a feeding call for to a minute or two before sweeping the frequency upwards to cue a synchronous lunge to the surface.

Between mid October and November the feeding stops in Alaska and the whales swim to the warm protected waters of Hawaii for the breeding and birthing season – a 2,818 mile (4535 km) journey that has been documented as taking as little as three weeks.In Hawaii, the Humpbacks display another quality of vocalizations – the Humpback’s famous mating song, sung exclusively by the males.
The song lasts between 20 – 35 minutes with each whale singing the same arrangement of verse, chorus, verse – though not in unison. Whereas in Alaska the Humpbacks maybe vocalize once every twenty minutes, the Winter Song is a continual presence in the waters of Hawaii.